P302Rivals Football - Chelsea FC
Sarri Question
by upthechels @, 13/05, 11:09

[^]

My opinion.

He took over a side that failed to qualify for the CL just weeks ahead of a new season. I think he always intended to use the like of RLC, CHO and Ampadu...he had many chances to use/hide behind Cahill, Drinkwater, Moses etc but the 3 mentioned were his go-to replacements.

He has a style, it's right his philosophy should be stuck to IMO, it's what got him the job. Sticking to that style (Jorginho key) saw us look to dominate the ball more. Counter-attacking football remained but it was less frequent as we took the fight into enemy territory rather than sit deep with the like of Cahill (respect but not the type needed). This change cost us Kante in his deep role but the whole change was one I am delighted with. Perhaps a fault using Kante and not just dropping him for someone used to and more suited to that new role? Although I do appreciate Kante not only scored more he actually improved his passing, movement and positioning. A manager with a long term plan will be very happy Kante has that season of learning under his belt.

I 100% understand why Sarri wants Higuain, their record together is impressive. However, I don't share Sarri's faith in Higuain at this stage. Batshuyi and Tammy are a better combo than the ageing Giroud and Higuain for me. Neither pairing is near good enough, sadly. The 5 away goals you mention tell us all we need to know about the current strikers.

I agree I don't think the players respect him, fuck the players - they have a habit of sticking the boot in on our managers. Spoilt cnuts think they run the club!!!

Sarri suggested the players had an attitude problem, they can give us top shows and then the next game the opposite. I think Sarri was quite right, the lads as a unit were/are never hitting consistency. This is the poorest squad regarding character that I can remember under RA. Sarri does not have the luxury of JT and Frank and that shows hugely.