Which would reflect extremely badly on the club. Employing someone for doing something, then sacking him when he does what’s he’s been employed for...
I’m sure he’d much rather fail on his own terms than compromise to try and please others and fail that way instead
- Good article 21-01-2019, 07:52
- Good article 21-01-2019, 08:15
- Good article 21-01-2019, 08:23
- Good article 21-01-2019, 08:32
- Good article 21-01-2019, 08:48
- Good article 21-01-2019, 09:24
- Good article 21-01-2019, 09:32
- Good article 21-01-2019, 09:45
- Good article 21-01-2019, 09:45
- Good article 22-01-2019, 09:16
- Good article 21-01-2019, 09:32
- Good article 21-01-2019, 09:24
- Good article 21-01-2019, 08:48
- Good article 21-01-2019, 08:33
- Good article 21-01-2019, 08:47
- Good article 21-01-2019, 08:52
- Good article 21-01-2019, 09:27
- Good article 21-01-2019, 08:32
- Good article 21-01-2019, 08:23
- Good article 21-01-2019, 08:49
- Good article 21-01-2019, 09:23
- Good article 21-01-2019, 09:31
- Good article 21-01-2019, 09:43
- Good article 21-01-2019, 12:36
- Good article 21-01-2019, 01:05
- Good article 21-01-2019, 01:09
- Good article 21-01-2019, 01:21
- Good article 21-01-2019, 02:24
- Good article 21-01-2019, 02:31
- Good article 21-01-2019, 02:57
- Good article 21-01-2019, 03:46
- Good article 21-01-2019, 02:24
- Good article 21-01-2019, 01:21
- Good article 21-01-2019, 01:09
- Good article 21-01-2019, 01:05
- Good article 21-01-2019, 08:15